Table 1

Results of 7 North American Trials of Labor Support including 2259 women
(comparing continuous labor support by doulas with usual care)

Author
Year
(# subjects)

Cesarean
Rate

Oxytocin
Use

Epidural
Rate

Narcotics
Use

Instrumental
Delivery

Maternal
Emotional
Distress

5 min.
Apgar <7
NICU

Cogan (13)
1988 (25)

N.A.

No diff

N.A.

decrease

N.A.

N.A.

decrease

Hodnett (14)
1989 (103)

No diff

increase

N.A.

decrease

No diff

N.A.

N.A.

Kennell (7)
1991(616)

decrease

decrease

decrease

No diff

decrease

N.A.

decrease

Kennell (8)
1993 (570)

decrease

N.A.

No diff

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

Gordon (15)
1999 (314)

No diff

No diff

decrease

No diff

No diff

decrease

N.A.

McGrath (9)
1999 (531)

decrease

decrease

decrease

decrease

No diff

N.A.

N.A.

Trueba (16)
2000 (100)

decrease

decrease

decrease

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

N.A.

KEY: No diff- no statistically significant difference between groups;N.A. – not assessed; increase – statistically significant increase in the supported group; decrease – statistically significant decrease in the supported group.

The results of 3 North American Trials 3, 17, 18 including 8052 women (comparing continuous labor support by NURSES – not doulas – with usual care) showed no differences in any outcomes listed in Table 1.

Findings of Hodnett’s et al meta-analysis of 15 trials from N. America, Europe, and Africa(10)

Women cared for during labor by a birth doula, compared to those receiving usual care were

  • 26% less likely to give birth by cesarean section
  • 41% less likely to give birth with a vacuum extractor or forceps
  • 28% less likely to use any analgesia or anesthesia
  • 33% less likely to be dissatisfied or negatively rate their birth experience